A portion of Dropbox's income should go toward continuing support of legacy hardware and software. We still use AFP and PostScript, don't we? I still use Timbuktu (originally developed by WOS Datasystems/Farallon/Netopia.) for remote control. Just because it's old doesn't mean it should go away. We need to demonstrate that there is still a significant PowerPC (PPC) user base out there which uses Dropbox Desktop Client. I am curious as to which Open Source and Third-Party components are causing Dropbox to drop legacy PPC support and functionality for Dropbox Desktop Client. For Dropbox to decommission Dropbox Desktop Client for Mac OS X 10.5.8 messes up my workflow and backup strategy. I have Dropbox syncing nicely on my new Synology DS 1513+ NAS. Being backwardly compatible and cross platform should be an ideal, not a burden. A portion of a company's income should go toward supporting legacy hardware and software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |